27, Mar, 26

MTG Players Enraged At Continued Disregard for Dead Format

Share

Magic: The Gathering’s March 24th ban announcement was, as expected, rather unexciting. Outside of a problematic turn-two combo being ejected out of Historic, things were completely quiet. In many ways, this is a great thing, reflecting the strong health of many MTG formats. With more ban windows added in 2026, we’re more likely to have many uneventful ones like this.

That said, some of the undercurrents expressed in the recent MTG ban write-up rubbed a lot of players the wrong way. Pioneer, in particular, has been on the way out for a while, completely starved of support from Wizards of the Coast. Despite year-long pleas from players to throw the format a bone, all they get is a request to “give the format a try.” Sadly, with the current state of things, there isn’t really a reason to.

Continued Calls for Support

Thalia, Guardian of Thraben
Thalia, Guardian of Thraben

Back in 2024, Wizards announced that there would be no Pioneer Pro Tours or Regional Championship Qualifiers in 2025. At the time, MTG players weren’t happy about this, as Pioneer was a widely played and well-supported format. We even got Pioneer Masters on MTG Arena that year, showing Wizards’ commitment to the format.

As a result, many players assumed that Pioneer’s absence from the competitive spotlight would be a temporary setback at best. Since then, however, we’ve barely heard a peep about it, as support has decreased rather than returned. Currently, there are no major competitive events on paper, and digital support is incredibly limited, too.

Given the limited event support, it’s hard to say Pioneer has many players right now. The format hasn’t died out entirely, especially at some local game stores, but it’s undeniably a shadow of its former self. With this in mind, it might seem sensible that Wizards isn’t giving a dying format tons of support.

The trouble with this assumption, however, is that the missing support is what’s killing Pioneer. Since this format was conceived by Wizards as a competitive alternative to Standard, the competitive focus was all this format had. While there were fans who enjoyed the metagame and possibilities, these evidently weren’t enough to sustain the playerbase.

Due to this, it’s hard to see Pioneer’s death as anything other than Wizards’ fault. Subsequently, when Wizards says to “give the format a try,” it feels like they’re rubbing salt in the wounds. From Wizards’ perspective, however, there’s a chance they’re trying to kickstart a mini revolution for the format.

Forcing a New Community Format Into Existence

Spell Stutter | Wilds of Eldraine | Art by Liiga Smilshkalne
Spell Stutter | Wilds of Eldraine | Art by Liiga Smilshkalne

Judging by Wizards’ recent encouraging remark, it really feels like they’re trying to push Pioneer as a community format. Arguably, it’s somewhat devolved to this level already, since the diehard fans are the only ones left. If it manages to get more attention, however, then it could potentially pick up again, seeing a major resurgence.

Recently, we’ve seen exactly how powerful these community formats can be. Premodern has been steadily amassing more and more players, especially after being officially added to Magic Online. Now, this format is consistently causing massive price spikes, and the metagame is still being solved, despite not getting new cards.

If Pioneer could capture the same magic as Premodern, or Pauper before it, then it could easily become worth supporting again. The trouble with this, however, is that Pioneer, unlike Premodern and Pauper, was never developed by the community. Making matters worse, Pioneer really isn’t in a good spot right now.

Even with a stable metagame, the format is simply too expensive, without incentives, and not unique enough to be worth jumping into. Thanks to the rise of Universes Beyond, and all the power creep it’s brought, Pioneer has a surprising amount of crossover with Standard. Decks like Izzet Prowess, for instance, can be played in both formats, and there’s remarkable crossover between them. While Pioneer was originally positioned as a place to play old Standard cards for longer, their convergence has left the format lacking identity.

Due to this, it’s hard to think that MTG players will gravitate toward Pioneer on their own volition, giving it community support. Instead, formats like Planar Standard feel much more likely to pick up steam. At the very least, this format is giving players something they’ve long been asking for, as it doesn’t contain Universes Beyond cards.

Just Make a Decision

Given the incredibly low chance of Pioneer resurrecting itself without help, Wizards need to do something. Realistically, there are two possible options when looking ahead, and at this point, either will do. Either Wizards needs to actually support this format with real events, or they simply need to let it die.

Considering Pioneer does, or rather did, have tons of genuine fans, giving it support again feels like the best shout. At the very least, this is exactly what many players are literally asking for right now. You don’t even need to go all in on the format, either, as even something as simple as a Spotlight Series could work wonders. Pauper and Legacy each have only milestone events to look forward to, and that goes a long way toward fostering the community.

Alternatively, Pioneer’s time in the spotlight may have simply come and gone at this point. Between Standard, Modern, and the now regular ban windows, players already have compelling competitive options. If anything, resurrecting Pioneer could dilute this pool, ultimately hurting event attendance and format interest.

Regardless of what the right decision is, the eternal reassurance that ‘Pioneer isn’t dead’ is not it. The community has been asking repetitively for something to happen, and Wizards has just kept shrugging things off. If you no longer want to support Pioneer, make it clear.

Stick with us at mtgrocks.com: the best place for Magic: The Gathering coverage!

*MTG Rocks is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
BROWSE